Veto Power : Institutional Design in the European Union
Veto rights can be a meaningful source of power only when leaving an organization is extremely unlikely. For example, small European states have periodically wielded their veto privileges to override the preferences of their larger, more economically and militarily powerful neighbors when negotiatin...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Частина з книги |
| Опубліковано: |
Ann Arbor
University of Michigan Press
20110901
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | Get Fullteks DOAB: description of the publication |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| LEADER | 02240naaaa2200313uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_27371 | ||
| 020 | |a mpub.2012704 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3998/mpub.2012704 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a English | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Slapin, Jonathan B. |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Veto Power : Institutional Design in the European Union |
| 260 | |a Ann Arbor |b University of Michigan Press |c 20110901 | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Veto rights can be a meaningful source of power only when leaving an organization is extremely unlikely. For example, small European states have periodically wielded their veto privileges to override the preferences of their larger, more economically and militarily powerful neighbors when negotiating European Union treaties, which require the unanimous consent of all EU members. Jonathan B. Slapin traces the historical development of the veto privilege in the EU and how a veto-or veto threat-has been employed in treaty negotiations of the past two decades. As he explains, the importance of veto power in treaty negotiations is one of the features that distinguishes the EU from other international organizations in which exit and expulsion threats play a greater role. At the same time, the prominence of veto power means that bargaining in the EU looks more like bargaining in a federal system. Slapin's findings have significant ramifications for the study of international negotiations, the design of international organizations, and European integration. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 653 | |a Political Science | ||
| 653 | |a Amsterdam | ||
| 653 | |a European integration | ||
| 653 | |a European Union | ||
| 653 | |a France | ||
| 653 | |a Germany | ||
| 653 | |a Intergovernmentalism | ||
| 653 | |a Member state of the European Union | ||
| 653 | |a Status quo | ||
| 653 | |a Veto | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/31768/1/625267.pdf |7 0 |z Get Fullteks |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/27371 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |