Chapter 8 Categorising What We Study and What We Analyse, and the Exercise of Interpretation

A lot of qualitative researchers have a healthy wariness about straightforward categorisation and modelling endeavours undertaken by quantitative researchers. Too often, variables and measurements are too rigid in quantitative analysis to take stock of all the complexity and context-dependency of hu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacobs, Dirk (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Cham Springer Nature 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02996naaaa2200445uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_29104
020 |a 978-3-319-76861-8_8 
020 |a 9783319768618 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-319-76861-8_8  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFFN  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Jacobs, Dirk  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 8 Categorising What We Study and What We Analyse, and the Exercise of Interpretation 
260 |a Cham  |b Springer Nature  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (17 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a A lot of qualitative researchers have a healthy wariness about straightforward categorisation and modelling endeavours undertaken by quantitative researchers. Too often, variables and measurements are too rigid in quantitative analysis to take stock of all the complexity and context-dependency of human behaviour, attitudes and identities. In the worst-case scenario for migration studies, this leads to oversimplification, essentialisation and culturalism. In line with King et al. (1994), I would, however, in this chapter, like to plead for qualitative researchers to take into account that, in terms of challenges of validity and reliability, we have a lot to learn from each other. Acknowledging that qualitative research has its distinctive advantages (Brady and Collier 2004), I will argue that choices in categorisation, case selection and research design are of crucial importance, perhaps even more in qualitative studies than in quantitative studies, even if in both methodological traditions we are confronted with similar challenges. Being transparent and reflecting on the consequences of our choices of categorisation, analysis and interpretation is of crucial importance. It is too easy to think that qualitative research would, by definition, be better equipped in doing justice to the phenomena we wish to study in the field of migration, especially if our research focusses on migrants. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-4.0/  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Migration, immigration & emigration  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Categorisation 
653 |a Ethnic minorities 
653 |a Migration Methodology 
653 |a Comparison 
653 |a Validity 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Control-group 
653 |a Brussels 
653 |a Demography 
653 |a Dependent and independent variables 
653 |a European Union 
653 |a Labour economics 
653 |a Qualitative research 
653 |a Research design 
653 |a Social science 
653 |a Unemployment 
773 1 0 |0 OAPEN Library ID: 1000195  |7 nnaa 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/29753/1/Jacobs2018_Chapter_CategorisingWhatWeStudyAndWhat.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29104  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication