Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy

What is a problem? What's asked in that question, and how does one even begin to take its measure? How else could one begin, except as one does with any other problem-by way of its impulsion. Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy is about philosophy because philosophy is about...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Munro, Michael (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Brooklyn, NY punctum books 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02806naaaa2200301uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_30009
020 |a P3.0031.1.00 
024 7 |a 10.21983/P3.0031.1.00  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPCF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Munro, Michael  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy 
260 |a Brooklyn, NY  |b punctum books  |c 2013 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (58 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a What is a problem? What's asked in that question, and how does one even begin to take its measure? How else could one begin, except as one does with any other problem-by way of its impulsion. Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy is about philosophy because philosophy is about problems: philosophy, in a word, is where problems become a problem. After Anti-Oedipus, in the Kafka book and in A Thousand Plateaus, what Deleuze and Guattari counsel, strikingly, is sobriety. Sobriety is what they praise in Kafka. And it is sobriety that seems above all else to be necessary here. (Steven Shaviro has pointed out the prominence of structure in Deleuze's writing: "even when Deleuze's prose, by himself or with Guattari, seems to be ranging anarchically all over the place, in fact it has a rigid and unvarying architecture, which is what keeps it from falling apart.") Of Learned Ignorance is a dead letter because it names a problem. It's a dead letter because it is, cautiously, a love letter. It's a dead letter because it lovingly stages an experiment in whimsy, and perhaps above all, because it is problematic (in the Kantian sense): It is a (sober) attempt at exemplifying what it talks about - and what eludes it: A series of footnotes, with blank (transcriptive) pages above, effects something like the integration of a differential, the reciprocal determination where the sources enter into in relation to one another in order to produce a paper, essay, or (inexistent) (chap)book. Of Learned Ignorance, in facing down a problem, makes a wager; it courts failure; it puts it all on the line. All, yes, for love - a kind of love ... (of wisdom?) 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Western philosophy, from c 1900 -  |2 bicssc 
653 |a philosophy 
653 |a Emmanuel Kant 
653 |a Franz Kafka 
653 |a Louis Althusser 
653 |a Gilles Deleuze 
653 |a Felix Guattari 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25585/1/1004510.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/30009  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication