The Impatient Muse : Germany and the Sturm und Drang
Far from being a forerunner of Weimar Classicism or an addendum to the Enlightenment, the Sturm und Drang is best seen as part of an autonomous culture of impatience-as literature in which Germans, frustrated with their fragmented land, simulated a sense of power and effectiveness that political rea...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Published: |
Chapel Hill
The University of North Carolina Press
1994
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get Fullteks DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 02363naaaa2200289uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_31182 | ||
| 005 | 20210210 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781469656731_Leidner | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5149/9781469656731_Leidner |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a English | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a DS |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Leidner, Alan C. |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Impatient Muse : Germany and the Sturm und Drang |
| 260 | |a Chapel Hill |b The University of North Carolina Press |c 1994 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (168 p.) | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Far from being a forerunner of Weimar Classicism or an addendum to the Enlightenment, the Sturm und Drang is best seen as part of an autonomous culture of impatience-as literature in which Germans, frustrated with their fragmented land, simulated a sense of power and effectiveness that political realities did not afford. This impatience drove not only authors and the characters they created; it also drew in German audiences and readers ready to partake vicariously in national sentiments that they otherwise could not have experienced. Alan Leidner sees Lavater's work as a model for dealing with a limiting culture, Goethe's Werther as a subtly arrogant figure, the drama of the "Kraftmensch" as a literature legitimizing the violence of its protagonists, the famous split in the "Urfaust" as the result of Goethe's resistance to the impatience that led many writers to fabricate a German nation that did not exist, and Schiller's "Die Räuber" as a liberating ritual that allowed German audiences to enjoy temporary feelings of national community. He concludes his study with an analysis of J. M. R. Lenz, whose texts recoil unequivocally in the face of the impatient muse. | ||
| 536 | |a National Endowment for the Humanities | ||
| 536 | |a Andrew W. Mellon Foundation | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Literature: history & criticism |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a German Studies | ||
| 653 | |a Literature | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/39864/1/9781469656731_WEB.pdf |7 0 |z Get Fullteks |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/31182 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |