The Principle of Unrest : Activist Philosophy in the Expanded Field

There is no such thing as rest. The world is always on the move. It is made of movement. We find ourselves always in the midst of it, in transformations under way. The basic category for understanding is activity - and only derivatively subject, object, rule, order. What is called for is an 'ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Massumi, Brian (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Open Humanities Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02987naaaa2200385uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_32588
020 |a OAPEN_630732 
020 |a 9781785420450 
024 7 |a 10.26530/OAPEN_630732  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HP  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Massumi, Brian  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Principle of Unrest : Activist Philosophy in the Expanded Field 
260 |b Open Humanities Press  |c 2017 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (148 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a There is no such thing as rest. The world is always on the move. It is made of movement. We find ourselves always in the midst of it, in transformations under way. The basic category for understanding is activity - and only derivatively subject, object, rule, order. What is called for is an 'activist' philosophy based on these premises. The Principle of Unrest explores the contemporary implications of an activist philosophy, pivoting on the issue of movement. Movement is understood not simply in spatial terms but as qualitative transformation: becoming, emergence, event. Neoliberal capitalism's special relation to movement is of central concern. Its powers of mobilization now descend to the emergent level of just-forming potential. This carries them beyond power-over to powers-to-bring-to-be, or what the book terms 'ontopower'. It is necessary to track capitalist power throughout its expanding field of emergence in order to understand how counter-powers can resist its capture and rival it on its own immanent ground. At the emergent level, at the eventful first flush of their arising, counter-powers are always collective. This even applies to movements of thought. Thought in the making is collective expression. How can we think this transindividuality of thought? What practices can address it? How, politically, can we understand the concept of the event to emergently include events of thought? Only by attuning to the creative unrest always agitating at the infra-individual level, in direct connection with the transindividual level, bypassing the mid-level of what was traditionally taken for a sovereign subject: by embracing our 'dividuality'. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a activist philosophy 
653 |a activity 
653 |a mobilization 
653 |a unrest 
653 |a transformations 
653 |a movement 
653 |a neoliberal capitalism 
653 |a Charles Sanders Peirce 
653 |a Immanence 
653 |a Logic 
653 |a Speed dating 
653 |a Surplus value 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/31351/1/630732.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/32588  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication