Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

Efforts to reform the U.S. campaign finance system typically focus on the corrupting influence of large contributions. Yet, as Raymond J. La Raja and Brian F. Schaffner argue, reforms aimed at cutting the flow of money into politics have unintentionally favored candidates with extreme ideological ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: La Raja, Raymond (auth)
Other Authors: Schaffner, Brian (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02663naaaa2200313uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_33895
020 |a ump.13855466.0001.001 
020 |a 9780472072996;9780472052998 
024 7 |a 10.3998/ump.13855466.0001.001  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JPHF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JPL  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a La Raja, Raymond  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Schaffner, Brian  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail 
260 |a Ann Arbor  |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (209 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Efforts to reform the U.S. campaign finance system typically focus on the corrupting influence of large contributions. Yet, as Raymond J. La Raja and Brian F. Schaffner argue, reforms aimed at cutting the flow of money into politics have unintentionally favored candidates with extreme ideological agendas and, consequently, fostered political polarization. Drawing on data from 50 states and the U.S. Congress over 20 years, La Raja and Schaffner reveal that current rules allow wealthy ideological groups and donors to dominate the financing of political campaigns. In order to attract funding, candidates take uncompromising positions on key issues and, if elected, take their partisan views into the legislature. As a remedy, the authors propose that additional campaign money be channeled through party organizations-rather than directly to candidates-because these organizations tend to be less ideological than the activists who now provide the lion's share of money to political candidates. Shifting campaign finance to parties would ease polarization by reducing the influence of "purist" donors with their rigid policy stances. La Raja and Schaffner conclude the book with policy recommendations for campaign finance in the United States. They are among the few non-libertarians who argue that less regulation, particularly for political parties, may in fact improve the democratic process. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Politics & government  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Elections & referenda  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Political parties  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Politics and government 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/24045/1/1006088.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33895  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication