Early and late selection: Effects of load, dilution and salience

Our visual system is constantly bombarded by a variety of stimuli, of which only a small part is relevant to the task at hand. As a result, goal-directed behavior requires a high degree of selectivity at some point in the processing stream. The precise point at which selection takes place has been t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tal Makovski (auth)
Other Authors: Bernhard Hommel (auth), Glyn Humphreys (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02846naaaa2200325uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_45621
005 20210211
020 |a 978-2-88919-255-7 
020 |a 9782889192557 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-255-7  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Tal Makovski  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Bernhard Hommel  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Glyn Humphreys  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Early and late selection: Effects of load, dilution and salience 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (143 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Our visual system is constantly bombarded by a variety of stimuli, of which only a small part is relevant to the task at hand. As a result, goal-directed behavior requires a high degree of selectivity at some point in the processing stream. The precise point at which selection takes place has been the focus of much debate. Early selection advocates argue that the locus of selection is at early stages of processing and that therefore, unattended stimuli are not fully processed. In contrast, late selection theorists argue that attention operates only after stimuli have been fully processed. Evidence supporting both sides has been accumulated over the years and the debate played a central role in the attention literature for decades. Perceptual load theory was put forward as an intermediate solution: the locus of selective attention depends on task requirements. When load is high, selection is early. When load is low, selection is late. This solution has been widely accepted and the early/late debate has been, for the most part, set aside. However, recently, perceptual load theory has been challenged on both theoretical and methodological grounds. It has been argued that it is not load, but rather perceptual dilution salience and other perceptual factors that determine the efficacy of attentional selection, which would call for a reevaluation of the current status of both perceptual load theory and its proposed alternatives, and more broadly, the early/late selection debate. The goal of this Research Topic is to provide an up-to-date overview of both empirical evidence and theoretical views on these key questions. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
653 |a salience 
653 |a dilution 
653 |a Attention 
653 |a perceptual load 
653 |a early selection 
653 |a Late selection 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/977/early-and-late-selection-effects-of-load-dilution-and-salience  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/45621  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication