From Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought
In the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: "Descriptive Q: What is human thinking like? Normative Q: What ought human thinking be like?" For decades, these two questions have dominated the field, and the relationship between them generated many a controversy....
Saved in:
Main Author: | David E. Over (auth) |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Shira Elqayam (auth) |
Format: | Book Chapter |
Published: |
Frontiers Media SA
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get Fullteks DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?
by: Gorka Navarrete
Published: (2016) -
Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives
Published: (2019) -
Bewertungen - Erwartungen - Gebrauch: Sprachgebrauchsnormen zur inneren Mehrsprachigkeit an der Universität
by: Vergeiner, Philip C.
Published: (2021) -
Decision-Making Experiments under Philosophical Analysis: Human Choice as a Challenge for Neuroscience
by: Carlos Eduardo Batista de Sousa
Published: (2015) -
Chapter 14 Responsibility for Fundamentalist Belief
by: Peels, Rik
Published: (2020)