Habits: Plasticity, learning and freedom

In present times, certain fields of science are becoming aware of the necessity to go beyond a restrictive specialization, and establish an open dialogue with other disciplines. Such is the case of the approach that neuroscience and philosophy are performing in the last decade. However, this increas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jose Ignacio Murillo (auth)
Other Authors: Javier Bernacer (auth), Jose Angel Lombo (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04401naaaa2200373uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_49054
005 20210211
020 |a 978-2-88919-673-9 
020 |a 9782889196739 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-673-9  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Jose Ignacio Murillo  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Javier Bernacer  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Jose Angel Lombo  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Habits: Plasticity, learning and freedom 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (148 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In present times, certain fields of science are becoming aware of the necessity to go beyond a restrictive specialization, and establish an open dialogue with other disciplines. Such is the case of the approach that neuroscience and philosophy are performing in the last decade. However, this increasing interest in a multidisciplinary perspective should not be understood, in our opinion, as a new phenomenon, but rather as a return to a classical standpoint: a proper understanding of human features -organic, cognitive, volitional, motor or behavioral, for example- requires a context that includes the global dimension of the human being. We believe that grand neuroscientific conclusions about the mind should take into account what philosophical reflection has said about it; likewise, philosophers should consider the organic constitution of the brain to draw inferences about the mind. Thus, both neuroscience and philosophy would benefit from each other's achievements through a fruitful dialogue. One of the main problems a multidisciplinary group encounters is terminology: the same term has a different scope in various fields, sometimes even contradictory. Such is the case of habits: from a neuroscientific perspective, a habit is a mere automation of an action. It is, therefore, linked to rigidity and limitation. However, from a classical philosophical account, a habit is an enabling capacity acquired through practice, which facilitates, improves and reinforces the performance of certain kind of actions. From neuroscience, habit acquisition restricts a subject's action to the learnt habit; from philosophy, habit acquisition allows the subject to set a distance from the simple motor performance to cognitively enrich the action. For example, playing piano is a technical habit; considering the neuroscientific account, a pianist would just play those sequences of keystrokes that had been repeatedly practiced in the past. However, according to the philosophical perspective, it would allow the pianist to improvise and, moreover, go beyond the movements of their hands to concentrate in other features of musical interpretation. In other words, a holistic view of habits focuses on the subject's disposition when facing both known and novel situations. We believe neuroscience could contribute to achieve a deeper understanding of the neural bases of habits, whose complexity could be deciphered by a philosophical reflection. Thus, we propose this Research Topic to increase our understanding on habits from a wide point of view. This collection of new experimental research, empirical and theoretical reviews, general commentaries and opinion articles covers the following subjects: habit learning; implicit memory; computational and complex dynamical accounts of habit formation; practical, cognitive, perceptual and motor habits; early learning; intentionality; consciousness in habits performance; neurological and psychiatric disorders related to habits, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, stereotypies or addiction; habits as enabling or limiting capacities for the agent. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
653 |a Neuroscience 
653 |a cognitive control 
653 |a agency 
653 |a habituation 
653 |a motor routine 
653 |a implicit learning 
653 |a procedural learning 
653 |a action 
653 |a Basal Ganglia 
653 |a Philosophy 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1889/habits-plasticity-learning-and-freedom  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/49054  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication