Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments

Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily an...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
第一著者: Büssing, Arndt (auth)
フォーマット: 図書の章
出版事項: MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
LEADER 03614naaaa2200877uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_52917
005 20210211
020 |a books978-3-03897-759-9 
020 |a 9783038977582 
020 |a 9783038977599 
024 7 |a 10.3390/books978-3-03897-759-9  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Büssing, Arndt  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments 
260 |b MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (148 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily answered with the instruments designed for previous questions. The field is expanding and, consequently, the research topics. Meanwhile several multidimensional instruments were developed which cover existential, prosocial, religious and non-religious forms of spirituality, hope, peace and trust—and several more. The ‘disadvantage’ of these instruments is the fact that some are conceptually broad and often rather unspecific, but they might be suited quite well for culturally and spiritually diverse populations when the intention is to compare such diverse groups. This is the reason why more research on new instruments is needed as can be found in this Special Issue, and to stimulate a critical debate about their pros and cons. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
653 |a religious trust 
653 |a n/a 
653 |a healthy persons 
653 |a religion and health 
653 |a bereavement 
653 |a psychometric properties 
653 |a meaning making 
653 |a Katz-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Judaism 
653 |a quantitative measure 
653 |a measures 
653 |a religiosity 
653 |a children 
653 |a medical ethics 
653 |a life satisfaction 
653 |a communication 
653 |a validation 
653 |a struggle 
653 |a needs 
653 |a well-being 
653 |a SHALOM 
653 |a spirituality 
653 |a DUREL 
653 |a anxiety 
653 |a spiritual crisis 
653 |a latent 
653 |a Reliance on God's help 
653 |a physician values 
653 |a Judaism 
653 |a quality of life 
653 |a attitude 
653 |a distress 
653 |a questionnaire 
653 |a faith 
653 |a affective religiosity 
653 |a measurement 
653 |a spiritual struggle 
653 |a Buddhism 
653 |a spiritual well-being 
653 |a psychology 
653 |a China 
653 |a complicated grief 
653 |a God 
653 |a complicated spiritual grief 
653 |a bifactor 
653 |a RCI-10 
653 |a religion 
653 |a spiritual care 
653 |a assess 
653 |a chronic illness 
653 |a confirmatory factor analysis 
653 |a cancer 
653 |a depression 
653 |a Australia 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://mdpi.com/books/pdfview/book/1261  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/52917  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication