Predictive Sentencing : Normative and Empirical Perspectives

Predictive Sentencing addresses the role of risk assessment in contemporary sentencing practices. Predictive sentencing has become so deeply ingrained in Western criminal justice decision-making that despite early ethical discussions about selective incapacitation, it currently attracts little criti...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Další autoři: Keijser, Jan W. de (Editor), Roberts, Julian V. (Editor), Rybert, Jesper (Editor)
Médium: Kapitola
Vydáno: Hart Publishers 2019
Témata:
On-line přístup:DOAB: description of the publication
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
LEADER 01979naaaa2200277uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_69538
005 20210506
020 |a 9781509921430 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a LNFX1  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Keijser, Jan W. de  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Roberts, Julian V.  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Rybert, Jesper  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Keijser, Jan W. de  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Roberts, Julian V.  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Rybert, Jesper  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Predictive Sentencing : Normative and Empirical Perspectives 
260 |b Hart Publishers  |c 2019 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Predictive Sentencing addresses the role of risk assessment in contemporary sentencing practices. Predictive sentencing has become so deeply ingrained in Western criminal justice decision-making that despite early ethical discussions about selective incapacitation, it currently attracts little critique. Nor has it been subjected to a thorough normative and empirical scrutiny. This is problematic since much current policy and practice concerning risk predictions is inconsistent with mainstream theories of punishment. Moreover, predictive sentencing exacerbates discrimination and disparity in sentencing. Although structured risk assessments may have replaced 'gut feelings', and have now been systematically implemented in Western justice systems, the fundamental issues and questions that surround the use of risk assessment instruments at sentencing remain unresolved. This volume critically evaluates these issues and will be of great interest to scholars of criminal justice and criminology. 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Sentencing & punishment  |2 bicssc 
653 |a risk assessment; contemporary sentencing practices; predictive sentencing 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69538  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication