Chapter Strengths and Weaknesses for Climate Change: Adaptation in Water Governance: A Comparison Across Six European Regions

This chapter comparatively analyses the policy and governance contexts of six European regions that are affected by different hydrological impacts of climate change. The results demonstrate that a major governance strength across regions lies in the organization of management capacities to deal with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bergsma, Emmy (auth)
Other Authors: Alphen, H. Van (auth), Bruggeman, A. (auth), Giannakis, E. (auth), Koti, J. (auth), Kristvik, E. (auth), Loza, P. (auth), Martinez, M. (auth), Muthanna, T.M (auth), Rocha, F. (auth), Viseu, T. (auth), Zoumides, C. (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: InTechOpen 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02814naaaa2200373uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_70466
020 |a intechopen.74401 
024 7 |a 10.5772/intechopen.74401  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a RBKF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Bergsma, Emmy  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Alphen, H. Van  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Bruggeman, A.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Giannakis, E.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Koti, J.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Kristvik, E.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Loza, P.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Martinez, M.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Muthanna, T.M.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Rocha, F.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Viseu, T.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Zoumides, C.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Strengths and Weaknesses for Climate Change: Adaptation in Water Governance: A Comparison Across Six European Regions 
260 |b InTechOpen  |c 2018 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a This chapter comparatively analyses the policy and governance contexts of six European regions that are affected by different hydrological impacts of climate change. The results demonstrate that a major governance strength across regions lies in the organization of management capacities to deal with existing water-related risks. For example, the Dutch context focuses on water safety, Cyprus has a clear policy framework to deal with water scarcity and in the Norwegian city of Bergen, wastewater is well managed. As a consequence of this focus on present-day risks, climate adaptation governance also focuses on historical risks. New or exacerbated risks posed by climate change remain largely untreated, and responsibilities for dealing with climate-related risks remain unspecified, as also becomes clear in the German and Spanish cases. A high degree of governmental fragmentation is identified as another point of weakness. Identified most clearly in the Portuguese case but recognizable in all regional contexts, different subdomains of water management are dealt with under separate policies and are governed by different responsible agencies. Consequently, information about current performance of the water system is scattered and coordinative efforts, which are key to developing adaptation strategies, are hampered. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Limnology (freshwater)  |2 bicssc 
653 |a water governance, climate change, regional impacts, adaptation 
773 1 0 |0 OAPEN Library ID: ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.74401_401  |7 nnaa 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49287/1/59604.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70466  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication