The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process : The Shadow of Case Law

The European Court of Justice is one of the most important actors in the process of European integration. Political science still struggles to understand its significance, with recent scholarship emphasizing how closely rulings reflect member states' preferences. In this book, I argue that the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schmidt, Susanne K. (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02923naaaa2200277uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_71095
005 20210709
020 |a oso/9780198717775.001.0001 
024 7 |a 10.1093/oso/9780198717775.001.0001  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JPSN2  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Schmidt, Susanne K.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process : The Shadow of Case Law 
260 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (320 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The European Court of Justice is one of the most important actors in the process of European integration. Political science still struggles to understand its significance, with recent scholarship emphasizing how closely rulings reflect member states' preferences. In this book, I argue that the implications of the supremacy and direct effect of the EU law have still been overlooked. As it constitutionalizes an intergovernmental treaty, the European Union has a detailed set of policies inscribed into its constitution that are extensively shaped by the Court's case law. If rulings have constitutional status, their impact is considerable, even if the Court only occasionally diverts from member states' preferences. By focusing on the four freedoms of goods, services, persons, and capital, as well as citizenship rights, the book analyses how the Court's development of case law has ascribed a broad meaning to these freedoms. The constitutional status of this case law constrains policymaking at the European and member-state levels. Different case studies show how major pieces of EU legislation cannot move beyond case law but have to codify its principles. Judicialization is important in the EU. It also directly constrains member-state policies. Court rulings oriented towards individual disputes are difficult to translate into general policies, and into administrative practices. Policy options are thereby withdrawn from majoritarian decision-making. As the Court cannot be overruled, short of a Treaty change, its case law casts a long shadow over policymaking in the European Union and its member states, undermining the legitimacy of this political order. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a EU & European institutions  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a International law  |2 bicssc 
653 |a European Court of Justice, judicialization, EU policymaking, case-law development, the power of the ECJ, constitutionalization 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49968/1/9780198717775.pdf  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/71095  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication