The Science of Bureaucracy : Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency

How the US Environmental Protection Agency designed the governance of risk and forged its legitimacy over the course of four decades. The US Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1970 to protect the public health and environment, administering and enforcing a range of statutes and progr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demortain, David (auth)
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Cambridge The MIT Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fullteks
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 03086naaaa2200421uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_78576
005 20220221
020 |a mitpress/12248.001.0001 
020 |a 9780262356671 
020 |a 9780262537940 
024 7 |a 10.7551/mitpress/12248.001.0001  |c doi 
041 0 |a English 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PDK  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a RND  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a RNQ  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Demortain, David  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Science of Bureaucracy : Risk Decision-Making and the US Environmental Protection Agency 
260 |a Cambridge  |b The MIT Press  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (452 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a How the US Environmental Protection Agency designed the governance of risk and forged its legitimacy over the course of four decades. The US Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1970 to protect the public health and environment, administering and enforcing a range of statutes and programs. Over four decades, the EPA has been a risk bureaucracy, formalizing many of the methods of the scientific governance of risk, from quantitative risk assessment to risk ranking. Demortain traces the creation of these methods for the governance of risk, the controversies to which they responded, and the controversies that they aroused in turn. He discusses the professional networks in which they were conceived; how they were used; and how they served to legitimize the EPA. Demortain argues that the EPA is structurally embedded in controversy, resulting in constant reevaluation of its credibility and fueling the evolution of the knowledge and technologies it uses to produce decisions and to create a legitimate image of how and why it acts on the environment. He describes the emergence and institutionalization of the risk assessment-risk management framework codified in the National Research Council's Red Book, and its subsequent unraveling as the agency's mission evolved toward environmental justice, ecological restoration, and sustainability, and as controversies over determining risk gained vigor in the 1990s. Through its rise and fall at the EPA, risk decision-making enshrines the science of a bureaucracy that learns how to make credible decisions and to reform itself, amid constant conflicts about the environment, risk, and its own legitimacy. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nc-nd/4.0  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Science funding & policy  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Environmental policy & protocols  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Nuclear issues  |2 bicssc 
653 |a risk sciences 
653 |a risk management 
653 |a dispute 
653 |a EPA 
653 |a risk paradigm 
653 |a ruckelshaus 
653 |a OSHA 
653 |a toxics 
653 |a carcinogens 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12248.001.0001  |7 0  |z Get Fullteks 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/78576  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication