Improving lecturers' evaluation score by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case at universiti kuala lumpur

The quality of education is primarily determined by the academician expertise, skills, abilities and competences. Poor quality of education will give bad impact to the institution.  It is very important to enhance the quality of service to ensure education system in Malaysia higher education is at p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saaludin, Nurashikin (Author), Ismail, Mohd Hafizul (Author), Che Mat, Basyirah (Author), Harun, Suriyati (Author)
Format: EJournal Article
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science, 2019-07-01.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02505 am a22003253u 4500
001 ijeecs18482_12578
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Saaludin, Nurashikin  |e author 
100 1 0 |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Ismail, Mohd Hafizul  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Che Mat, Basyirah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Harun, Suriyati  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Improving lecturers' evaluation score by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case at universiti kuala lumpur 
260 |b Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science,   |c 2019-07-01. 
500 |a https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/18482 
520 |a The quality of education is primarily determined by the academician expertise, skills, abilities and competences. Poor quality of education will give bad impact to the institution.  It is very important to enhance the quality of service to ensure education system in Malaysia higher education is at par as international education standard. To achieve the international standard, the teaching quality of lecturers must be seriously taken into consideration. An appropriate method of lecturers' evaluation should be used to measure lecturers' performance and credibility. The purpose of this study is to improve the lecturers' evaluation score by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP is used to obtain the weightage of each criteria in lecturers' evaluation.  The results show that teaching delivery carries the highest weightage, followed by assesment, course content and course material, lecturer's interaction and lecturer's commitment criteria. By implementing a new method of calculation, the overall score will be more accurate in describing the overall lecturers performance from students' point of view. 
540 |a Copyright (c) 2019 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 
540 |a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 
546 |a eng 
690
690 |a Analytic hierarchy process; Criteria; Lectures' evaluation; Pair wise comparison 
655 7 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |2 local 
655 7 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  |2 local 
655 7 |2 local 
786 0 |n Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; Vol 15, No 1: July 2019; 391-398 
786 0 |n 2502-4760 
786 0 |n 2502-4752 
786 0 |n 10.11591/ijeecs.v15.i1 
787 0 |n https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/18482/12578 
856 4 1 |u https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/18482/12578  |z Get fulltext