Performance analysis routing protocol between RIPv2 and EIGRP with termination test on full mesh topology

Data access on a company is a very important part of an institution or a college. Especially in the present time, the internet has become an important thing in human life. With the existence of certain means there is a problem that will arise, needed solution or way out on a network that can be call...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prehanto, D. R. (Author), Indriyanti, A. D. (Author), Permadi, G. S. (Author)
Format: EJournal Article
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science, 2021-07-01.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02301 am a22003133u 4500
001 ijeecs23948_15185
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Prehanto, D. R.  |e author 
100 1 0 |e contributor 
700 1 0 |a Indriyanti, A. D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Permadi, G. S.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Performance analysis routing protocol between RIPv2 and EIGRP with termination test on full mesh topology 
260 |b Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science,   |c 2021-07-01. 
500 |a https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/23948 
520 |a Data access on a company is a very important part of an institution or a college. Especially in the present time, the internet has become an important thing in human life. With the existence of certain means there is a problem that will arise, needed solution or way out on a network that can be called protocol. Because an institution needs to choose network methods properly and safely.This study focuses on addressing the path/route of data packets to be sent will be governed by this routing protocol in the form of table routing. Routing used adip RIPv2 with EIGRP which will be compared on both routing protocol which is better against predetermined situation previous.The result of the research using CISCO Packet Tracer 7.10 software shows that EIGRP routing run on two topologies has faster convergence time speed with an average time of 0.01 - 0.02 seconds as well as the change of its routing table at once. Unlike RIPv2 routing that takes longer than EIGRP routing is with the time range from 0.01 to 0.19.  
540 |a Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 
540 |a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 
546 |a eng 
690
690 |a EIGRP; Performance; RIPv2; Routing 
655 7 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/article  |2 local 
655 7 |a info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  |2 local 
655 7 |2 local 
786 0 |n Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; Vol 23, No 1: July 2021; 354-361 
786 0 |n 2502-4760 
786 0 |n 2502-4752 
786 0 |n 10.11591/ijeecs.v23.i1 
787 0 |n https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/23948/15185 
856 4 1 |u https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/23948/15185  |z Get fulltext