Criminal Liability of State-Owned Banks on the Disbursement of Non Performing Loans

Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol.73, 2018

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalina, Fina (Author), Harianto, Aries (Author)
Format: Academic Paper
Published: 2018-06-28T06:36:58Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fulltext
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02354 am a22002293u 4500
001 repository_unej_123456789_86042
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rosalina, Fina  |e author 
500 |a 2224-3240 
500 |a http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/86042 
700 1 0 |a Harianto, Aries  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Criminal Liability of State-Owned Banks on the Disbursement of Non Performing Loans 
260 |c 2018-06-28T06:36:58Z. 
520 |a Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol.73, 2018 
520 |a The imposition of criminal liability for the disbursement of non-performing loans by the State-Owned Bank has limitations that cause legal uncertainty. The existence of the legal uncertainty leads to the blurred nature of the scope of legal validity of State Owned Bank liability for non-performing loans that have been disbursed. The extent of the notion of state finance contained in the Corruption Eradication Act is not followed with the understanding of the state financial losses itself. The legal consequence of such enforcement is giving criminal sanction of corruption toward the bank on part/whole ownership of the shares owned by the government, for the disbursement of non-performing loans. The irony is that there is no limitative restriction in the Banking Act concerning banks as perpetrators or victims of crime, so that criminal liability can only be charged to members of the Board of Commissioners, Directors, or Bank Officers as breakers and/or originators of non-performing loans. Bank as an institution is free from the imposition of criminal sanctions, whereas institutionally, banking institution is also a legal subject. The principle of the criminal law that no action can be criminalized without any error or guilt, should be used as an effort to answer legal issues in constructing the law in order to discover the novelty of meaning and argumentation in the legislation as the material for the legal making or legal repairing of the existing legislation with the intention of establishing legal certainty in the field of national Banking Act. 
546 |a en 
690 |a State Owned Bank 
690 |a legal subject 
690 |a legal certainty 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
787 0 |n http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/86042 
856 4 1 |u http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/86042  |z Get Fulltext