Was Borobudur a mandala?

The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miksic, John (Author)
Format: Academic Paper
Published: Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur, 2010-12.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get Fulltext
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 00966 am a22002293u 4500
001 repokemdikbud_291_
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Miksic, John  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Was Borobudur a mandala? 
260 |b Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur,   |c 2010-12. 
500 |a http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/1/Jurnal%202010%202%20Was%20Borobudur%20a%20Mandala.pdf 
520 |a The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected. 
546 |a en 
690 |a Kebudayaan 
690 |a Cagar Budaya 
690 |a Candi 
690 |a Warisan budaya 
690 |a Penelitian kebudayaan 
655 7 |a Article  |2 local 
655 7 |a PeerReviewed  |2 local 
787 0 |n http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/ 
856 4 1 |u http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/  |z Get Fulltext