Was Borobudur a mandala?
The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Academic Paper |
| Published: |
Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur,
2010-12.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get Fulltext |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 00966 am a22002293u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | repokemdikbud_291_ | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Miksic, John |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Was Borobudur a mandala? |
| 260 | |b Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur, |c 2010-12. | ||
| 500 | |a http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/1/Jurnal%202010%202%20Was%20Borobudur%20a%20Mandala.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected. | ||
| 546 | |a en | ||
| 690 | |a Kebudayaan | ||
| 690 | |a Cagar Budaya | ||
| 690 | |a Candi | ||
| 690 | |a Warisan budaya | ||
| 690 | |a Penelitian kebudayaan | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Article |2 local | |
| 655 | 7 | |a PeerReviewed |2 local | |
| 787 | 0 | |n http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/ | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/ |z Get Fulltext |