Was Borobudur a mandala?
The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected.
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Academic Paper |
Published: |
Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur,
2010-12.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get Fulltext |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
LEADER | 00966 am a22002293u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | repokemdikbud_291_ | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Miksic, John |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Was Borobudur a mandala? |
260 | |b Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan: Balai Konservasi Borobudur, |c 2010-12. | ||
500 | |a http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/1/Jurnal%202010%202%20Was%20Borobudur%20a%20Mandala.pdf | ||
520 | |a The suggestion that borobudur was a mandala has been considered by many scholars. In a paper presented at the Pertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi ke-7 at cipanas in March 1996, Marike Klokke advanced her reason why this hypothesis should be rejected. | ||
546 | |a en | ||
690 | |a Kebudayaan | ||
690 | |a Cagar Budaya | ||
690 | |a Candi | ||
690 | |a Warisan budaya | ||
690 | |a Penelitian kebudayaan | ||
655 | 7 | |a Article |2 local | |
655 | 7 | |a PeerReviewed |2 local | |
787 | 0 | |n http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/ | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/291/ |z Get Fulltext |